Open in Hush

Apolivaras · 21 hearts · 683 replies

Christians should be allowed to turn the USA into a Christian nation; yes or no?

683 replies

by violet_modernist · 6 hearts

This guy said he was down to debate and then immediately ran away when he realised he was out of his depth

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

You changed the topic of the debate the moment it started, and I don't debate with people who use manipulation and bad faith tactics

by violet_modernist · 1 heart

Enough of the lies mate. You ran. You. Ran. It's as simple as that. The debate is still open. I have given you like a thousand chances. I can discuss the Bible. The church. History. Legislation. Whatever. But as soon as I got into that stuff, you made an excuse and ran

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

You being bad faith is not an excuse lmao. Its just the truth. And I don't discuss with people like that.

by green_minnion · 6 hearts

We are free to BE Christians, but please fuck off with your christian Nationalism

by asdfdsa · 3 hearts

As an atheist, can I say Amen

by Thatweirdgirl · 5 hearts

That is one of the most un-American questions I've heard in a while. No. It's unconstitutional and it's un-American.

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

The constitution can be changed, and then it wouldnt be unconstitutional anymore.

by gold_vol · 5 hearts

You can turn it into anything that enough people vote for.

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

Bingo

by gold_vol · 1 heart

It’s truly ridiculous why people don’t understand this. “You shouldn’t tell me I can’t have an abortion due to your religious views.” Well actually, I have the right to vote for those who legislate based on my values. So git rekt.

by violet_modernist · 5 hearts

All christians are evil

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

Quite the claim. Have any evidence to back that up?

by Vic Vega · 0 hearts

Prove it

by violet_modernist · 2 hearts

They are violent and sociopathic. Send me a DM if you want to debate it

by indigo_livestock · 4 hearts

That sounds counter to the very foundation of your country

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

How can it be if its democratically voted for?

by indigo_livestock · 0 hearts

One of the core tennants the country was founded on the freedom to express your religious beliefs without fear of persecution

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

No one said anything about persecuting anyone.

by WanderInAwe96 · 4 hearts

We should be able to freely live out our faith. But we can’t force everyone to believe. God gave us all free will. Not just those who are Christian.

by Meow69 · 4 hearts

We have a long history of religious freedom. So no

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

People can still be religiously free in a Christian nation.

by Meow69 · 2 hearts

lol they cannot. Literally it’s in the name of

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

Sure they can. Finland has a nationally recognized church. Two in fact, both that follow the Christian religion. AND they allow the free worship of other religions! Well how about that, I just proved you wrong. Will you say sorry now?

by CedarFalls · 4 hearts

USA is already founded in Christian beliefs

by circut_green · 4 hearts

No, it goes against everything the founding fathers stood for. Their writings on this are very clear. This founding principle is one of the reasons Jewish communities were established all over the early states. Muslim communities didn't spring up at the same rate due to Muslim countries existing. Same reason unwelcome sects of Christianity came to the shores of the USA. There's a reason it is in the First Amendment, it is to be considered that core of a principle.

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

Who cares if it goes against what the founding fathers stood for. You think they are perfect? The first amendment is flexible and can be changed. All that needs to happen is enough Christians being voted into state legislature and congress.

by circut_green · 1 heart

This is literally the kind of thinking & authoritarian style of rule the founding fathers warned about and wanted to avoid. The first amendment is not flexible, it is clearly defined and unambiguous. Unlike the second amendment which is very vague, they use the term militias not persons or individuals, this was because they did not want the US to have a large standing military. They felt a large standing military was a risk that could be used against citizens. This is one of the causes for Declaration of Independence.

by Short_skirts · 4 hearts

Freedom of religion right there in the first amendment

by Apolivaras · 1 heart

Being a Christian nation and freedoms of religion are not mutually exclusive.

by Short_skirts · 1 heart

If you say so

by Apolivaras · 4 hearts

Just let it be known, @fuchsia_pulse couldn't hold his own in our debate, so he blocked me. Womp womp. Christ is King. 🤴

by InsatiableHabit · 0 hearts

Christ isn't real. Womp womp. Your whole belief system is built on lies and inferiority.

by Apolivaras · 1 heart

He's a documented historical figure. Of course he's real.

by InsatiableHabit · 0 hearts

What other delusional fairy tales do you believe in? You need your sky Daddy to be a man. How embarrassing

by azure_raven · 4 hearts

Fuck no, that very idea is anti American

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

How is it anti American for a certain group of people being voted into congress lawfully, lawfully proposing an amendment that amends the establishment clause of the first amendment through Article V of the Constitution, and then establishing a national religion? You can legally and lawfully do that via America's legal system. That's the most American thing you can do!

by azure_raven · 0 hearts

It's anti constitutional and against the express listed wishes of the founders, many of which were non Christian

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

Its not anti constitutional. Article V of the Constitution strictly states that amendments in the constitution can be amended. This would include the first amendments establishment clause, making it a constitutional change.

by Business_taco · 3 hearts

lol because that worked out so well for them in Europe before they came here😂

by ComfyRat · 3 hearts

The whole point is diversity. No.

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

You can still have diversity in a Christian nation.

by ComfyRat · 0 hearts

Well you can’t actually. It’s diversity in all senses, that means religion/religious freedom. I don’t believe in any of that, I feel I shouldn’t have to succumb to your religion just because you say so.

by El Chud Diablo · 3 hearts

Christianity is a religion of oppression. It needs to be destroyed.

by violet_modernist · 0 hearts

Amen brother

by black_linguist · 0 hearts

You misspelled Islam

by circut_green · 3 hearts

You are more than welcome to propose this as the 28th amendment. Good luck with getting it to pass. Asking people to change The First Amendment is big ask. As some say we have The First Amendment, & The Second Amendment is for if the First Amendment is taken away or ignored.

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

We just have to vote in more Christians. Luckily the nation is 61% Christian, so we have a good sporting chance. Not 100% going to happen, not even 50% chance of it happening. But, I've seen worse odds. Anyways, my argument wasnt if it was going to be easy. My argument is that Christians are allowed to do such a thing. And you would agree with me that they are, yes?

by circut_green · 0 hearts

The answer is no. There are many Christians in the US that also agree. This road would open the question of what sects would be Christian. There are sects that would be worried about being left out or persecuted. This is why the Founding Fathers explicitlv stated no National Religion.

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

Why are you discriminating against a certain people group with what other people groups are allowed to do? Why can't Christians amend the constitution to how they think the public sees fit, while others can? Seems bigoted to me.

by Sukunasty · 3 hearts

No

by Sir Meat · 3 hearts

It's far from that.

by fuchsia_immigrant · 3 hearts

No. Never. Especially since Christians who want to do so are Christian in title only. Not one of these people act like Christ, and only one who emulated the god they worship can claim to be their follower.

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

No one can act like Christ. To be Human is to be a sinner. Thats why, you know.. christ died on the cross?

by fuchsia_immigrant · 0 hearts

You can very easily act like Christ, you just can't be perfect. Hell, he wasn't perfect. He cursed a fig tree for being out of season and beat tax collectors with a whip while flipping their tables, dude had clear anger issues. But he left a pretty clear road map of how to act through his words and deeds. To claim to be a Christian you need to act like Christ at every opportunity and atone when you fail, not hide behind him like a shield and say "Well, he'll forgive me." If you ignore injustice, the hungry, the poor, and the needy, or worse you mock them, then you're little more than a heretic.

by downer · 3 hearts

I thought we were found on Religious Freedom..

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

We were also founded with the ability to amend the constitution.

by 🙄psyquack3000 · 1 heart

ok so we should get rid of that ability. 👍👍 at least for nut jobs like you

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

How undemocratic

by whorrific · 3 hearts

why cant atheist turn it into a devil worshiping nation? see how dumb that sounds?

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

They can. If they amend the constitution.

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

See how I was able to answer your question?

by gold_vol · 0 hearts

Why couldn’t they? If enough atheists could vote to sway legislation, it could happen. But why would an atheist worship anything?

by mint green_interchange · 3 hearts

No. This country was founded on the principles of liberty, not Christianity. Those principles may be based in judeo-christian values, but liberty is more tolerant than a theology-based government.

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

I never mentioned theology, which would be a system of government where a nation is ruled by religious leaders who act through divine guidance, or where a god is recognized as the supreme ruler. I haven't even mentioned that.

by MoonBear · 3 hearts

As a Christian, NO. Separation of Church and State is necessary. People should live their own lives. Not everyone HAS to believe the things I do and it is unbelievably unfair to push my ideals onto someone else.

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

Why couldn't you live your own life in a nation that recognizes Christianity as the national religion?

by MoonBear · 1 heart

It would dismantle the separation of Church and State. It would go against the first amendment. People wouldn’t be able to live their own life because they’d be forced to live the Christian way.

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

No one said anything about forcing people to live or follow Christianity.

by PolyPup · 3 hearts

Wtaf no

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

Y not

by PolyPup · 0 hearts

We were founded on freedom of religion. That means you can choose to worship whomever tf you want to but you cannot make others do the same. You do not get to change the constitution.

by Apolivaras · 0 hearts

Actually, under Article V, the constitution CAN be changed